Skip to main content
Home / Editorial policy
Editorial policy

Useful preparation without invented authority

We separate occupational context, employer-specific evidence, candidate experience and automated observations. A confident sentence is not a substitute for a responsible source.

How we research

The current job description is the primary input. Occupational sources help establish broad task boundaries. Employer-process claims require a current first-party source or a dated, licensed candidate-report dataset.

We do not claim that an employer will ask a question unless evidence supports that limited claim, and even then we describe uncertainty.

How we use examples

Samples are labelled fictional and editable. They demonstrate structure only. Readers are instructed to replace or remove every untrue detail.

We do not fabricate candidates, recruiters, offers, salaries, outcomes or testimonials.

Human review

Representative role and question templates require a named career editor. Regulated roles, technical assessments, compensation and employer-specific material require additional specialist review.

Corrections

Substantive corrections should name the page, disputed statement and supporting source. A correction record will show what changed and when once a public contact channel is available.